ABSTRACT
Background: Breats cancer is a major health problem in elderly ( >= 70 years) women. Increase incidence with age and the progressive increase in life expectancy mean that the numbers in elderly breast cancer diagnosis are increasing. These patients do not always receive the proper treatment and despite this the survival of this population is not always depends on cancer, there are other competing causes of death typical of the aging population. Method(s): A retrospective observational analysis of women >= age 70 diagnosed with breast carcinoma in HUPHM between 2014 and 2020 was made. Clinical, pathological data and stages at diagnosis were analyzed. We checked our patients with the national death center (official national registry) thus obtaining an exact date of death and the cause of death. Data updated in January 2023 , ensuring a minimum follow-up of 24 months. We excluded deaths from Covid or of unknown cause to avoid bias. Result(s): A total of 421 patients were analyzed, mean age of 78.6 years and median follow-up of 48 months. 28% of patients had died at the time of analysis, 11% due to cancer and 17% from other causes. If we analyze the population deceased by cancer, no deaths are detected in patients diagnosed with carcinoma in situ (4% of the population), in stage I (30% of the population) the cumulative incidence of cancer death at 5 years is 3%, 7% In stage II (30% of the population), 15% in stage III (16%) and 70% in stage IV (12%). Death by other causes are more frequent in early breast cancer, the cumulative incidence at 5 years are 10% in stage I, 22% in stage II, 44% in satge III and just 10% in stage IV. The most frequent causes of death in this population were caridovascular events and infections. There are no differences in 5-year mortality according to histological subtypes 20%, 12%, 25% and 12% for triple negative, Rh+/HER2-, RH+/her2+ and RH-/HER2+ respectively. Conclusion(s): Although elderly patients do not receive optical treatments, mortality from cancer in early stages is incidental at 5 years, a different scenario is seen in metastatic disease in which the patient's prognosis depends mainly on the oncological disease, Therefore, an effort should be made in the treatment of these patients with metastatic breast cancer since adequate treatments can have a clearly positive impact on the survival of patients. Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors. Funding(s): Has not received any funding. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Background: Most patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) do not achieve current LDL-C goals proposed by European guidelines with conventional lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). Chronic use of PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) have shown to reduce LDL-C levels up to 61% on top of statins. Persistence to chronic LLT is important to reduce the burden of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Purpose(s): To analyze persistence and effectiveness of PCSK9i in clinical practice setting in FH patients from the SAFEHEART register with longterm follow-up. Method(s): SAFEHEART is an open, long-term prospective study of a cohort of subjects with molecular diagnosis of FH. Follow-up is carried out every year through a standardized phone-call to collect clinical conditions, persistence to medications, lipid profile, and cardiovascular events. This study analyses subjects >=18 years of age on stable LLT who have received PCSK9i. Result(s): 696 individuals (46% females), median age 56.4 years (IQR 49- 66) started with PCSK9i (49% alirocumab and 51% evolocumab). Out of them 38% had history of ASCVD, and 89% were on maximum LLT. Median LDL-C at the moment of starting PCSK9i was 145 mg/dL (IQR, 123- 177), representing a poor 2016 & 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines achievement (3% and 0.1% respectively). After a median follow-up of 3.7 years (IQR, 2.3-4.8), 669 patients (96%) remained on PCSK9i treatment during entire follow-up. Only 27 patients (4%) discontinued, 5 temporarily (0.7%) and 22 permanently (3.2%). Most common reasons for PCSK9i treatment interruption were medical decision (n=6), adverse event (AE) (n=5), patient decision not related with AE (n=5) and comorbidity (n=5). Median time to permanent discontinuation was 15 months (IQR, 4-33). Median LDL-C levels observed and % of LDL-C reduction obtained after 1 year of treatment and in the last follow-up visit were: 63 mg/dL (IQR, 43- 88), 61 mg/dL (IQR, 44-82), 57.6% (IQR, 39.5-69) and 58% (IQR, 44-68), respectively. 2016 ESC/EAS guidelines LDL-C goals was achieved by 70% of patients at year 1 and 77% in the last follow-up visit after the introduction of PCSK9i (p<0.001). 2019 ESC/EAS goals were achieved by 44.5% and 48% (p=0.1). Conclusion(s): Long-term persistence to PCSK9i treatment in FH patients is very high (96%) and reasons for discontinuation are diverse. This study shows that COVID-19 pandemic did not affected persistence to treatment. Effectiveness in LDL-C reduction and LDL-C goal achievement improved significantly with introduction of PCSK9i in clinical practice setting.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Cancer healthcare has been affected by Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, interfering the normal function of oncology units and increasing diagnostic delay. Nevertheless, the rising incidence of respiratory infections led to an increase in medical consultations and chest imaging explorations. The aim of the study was to assess whether the increase in medical evaluations in the context of the pandemic led to an increase in the detection of early-stage thoracic tumours. Methods: We performed a retrospective single-institution study, collecting data from patients diagnosed with thoracic tumours between March, 1, 2020 and December, 31, 2021. We analysed their demographic and clinical data, symptoms at diagnosis and those who were diagnosed due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results: A total of 378 patients were analysed. Main results are shown in Table-1. Only 5.3% of newly diagnosed thoracic tumours were related to a suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, these patients were not diagnosed at earlier stages (p = 0.414). When we evaluated symptoms at diagnosis, we found that asymptomatic patients presented in earlier stages (p <0.000, Figure-1), being the majority incidental findings during the follow-up of oncological and non-oncological pathologies. Regarding symptomatic patients, most presented as locally advanced or metastatic diseases and no changes have been observed in the pattern of presentation compared to studies prior to the pandemic. [Formula presented] Conclusions: COVID-19 pandemic did not seem to increase thoracic tumours diagnosis in our study. Lung cancer diagnosed in patients due to SARS-CoV-2 infection was not detected in earlier stages. Clinical presentation was similar to previous reported outside COVID-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, we find that asymptomatic patients diagnosed incidentally presented more frequently in localized stages in comparison with symptomatic patients. [Formula presented] Keywords: COVID19, Lung Cancer, Diagnosis